The Federal Safety Net: Cost and Context

In fiscal year 2024, the federal safety net, or "welfare" as some call it, (SNAP, housing vouchers, school lunch, heating aid, and four other programs) cost $221 billion, or about 3.3% of the federal budget. Many Americans believe these programs are bloated, their budgets should be cut, and that their beneficiaries should be able to lift themselves out of poverty without taxpayer support.

The evidence tells a different story. The federal government loses more to uncollected taxes, documented fraud, and systemic waste than the entire safety net costs, every single year. These programs cost a fraction of the budget and are a lifeline for historically disenfranchised communities.

The analysis below contextualizes the cost of these programs using data from CBO, GAO, IRS, CMS, USDA, and other federal sources. All figures are FY2024 unless otherwise noted.

---

The full budget at a glance

The federal government spent $6.75 trillion in FY2024:

---

What safety net programs actually cost

Program	FY2024 Cost	People Served	Avg. Benefit
SNAP (food stamps)	$99.8B	41.7M/month	$187/month*
Section 8 (housing vouchers)	$32.4B	~2.3M households	~$1,174/month
Pell Grants	$31.5B	6.3M students	$5,000/year
School lunch	$17.7B	~30M children/day	~$3.28/lunch
TANF (cash assistance)	$16.5B	~2.1M families	~$655/month
Head Start	$12.3B	~833K children	~$14,800/year
WIC (nutrition for mothers/infants)	$7.2B	~6.3M/month	~$95/month
LIHEAP (heating/cooling)	$4.1B	~5.3M households	~$774/year

\*SNAP per-person figure reflects average monthly benefit per participant, not total program cost (which includes administrative expenses) divided by participants.

That's $221 billion combined. TANF's federal block grant has been frozen at $16.5 billion since 1996 with no inflation adjustment, which equates to a 40% cut in purchasing power by CBPP's estimate as of 2021.

---

Where the money actually disappears

Here's where the real gaps are. Every item below is documented by federal auditors, inspectors general, or official government data.

The tax gap: $606 billion per year

The IRS estimates a net $606 billion gap between taxes owed and taxes actually collected (tax year 2022), after accounting for late payments and enforcement recoveries. The gross gap before those recoveries is $696 billion. Both figures have nearly doubled since 2001.

77% is underreported income, concentrated in business income lacking third-party reporting: sole proprietors, pass-throughs, and partnerships. The GAO and CRS have flagged this as a persistent, structural problem on the GAO High-Risk List for years.

The tax gap is uncollected revenue, not direct spending, so the remedies differ. But the net tax gap is nearly 3x the entire safety net, every single year.

Government-wide fraud and improper payments

In 2024, the GAO published its first-ever government-wide fraud estimate: the federal government loses between $233 billion and $521 billion annually to fraud, or 3-7% of average annual obligations. Even the low-end estimate exceeds the entire safety net. This excludes tax fraud (that's the tax gap above) and state-level fraud.

Separately, the GAO reported $162 billion in improper payments in FY2024. The largest components:

Program	Improper Payments (FY2024)	Error Rate	Source
Medicare (all parts)	$54.3B	5.6-7.7%	CMS
Medicaid	$31.1B	5.1%	CMS
Earned Income Tax Credit	$21.9B	33.9%	IRS / CRS

Most improper payments aren't fraud. 68% of Medicare errors and 74% of Medicaid errors involve missing documentation: systemic process failures, not criminal activity. But the dollars are real.

Defense spending: $1.2 trillion and no accountability

The FY2024 NDAA authorized $886 billion for national defense. The actual national security footprint is larger:

Component	FY2024 Cost	Source
DOD military activities	$832B	CRS R47582
DOE nuclear weapons programs	$35.1B	CRS R47582
Other defense (FBI CI, CISA, etc.)	$12.1B	CRS R47582
Veterans Affairs	$310B	CRS R48056
Total national security	~$1.2T	Combined

All figures FY2024. National security includes DOD, DOE nuclear, intelligence, and VA. Safety net is SNAP, TANF, WIC, Section 8, LIHEAP, Pell Grants, Head Start, and school lunch.

The DOD's annual budget was 3.8x more than all eight safety net programs combined. The full national security footprint reaches 5.4x the safety net cost.

The Department of Defense is the only federal agency that has never passed a financial audit. Required to be audit-ready since 1990, the DOD wasn't audited until FY2018. It has failed every one since.

In the most recent audit (November 2024), the DOD could not adequately document 63% of its $3.8 trillion in assets. This doesn't mean $2.4 trillion is missing or stolen; it means accounting systems are so poor that auditors cannot verify whether these assets exist, are properly maintained, or are allocated efficiently. The GAO found $10.8 billion in confirmed fraud between FY2017 and FY2024. DOD financial management has been on the GAO High-Risk List every year since 1995.

The F-35 Joint Strike Fighter will exceed $2 trillion in lifetime costs according to the GAO, with sustainment costs alone up 44% since 2018. Over a decade behind schedule, the military now plans to fly the jets less than originally intended.

In FY2024, the DOD awarded $456.2 billion in contracts. Lockheed Martin alone received $50.7 billion, more than TANF, Head Start, WIC, and LIHEAP combined.

Boeing paid $615 million for misusing competitor data; KBR paid $579 million for kickbacks on military contracts. In FY2023, the DOJ recovered $2.68 billion in False Claims Act settlements. This is just what gets caught.

Systemic waste

Legacy IT: $83 billion per year on maintenance. The federal government spends approximately $105 billion annually on IT. Of that, $83 billion (79%) maintains existing systems, not modernization. The Treasury Department still runs systems dating to the late 1960s. GAO identified 11 legacy systems most in need of modernization: 8 use outdated languages like COBOL, 4 run on unsupported hardware, and 7 have known cybersecurity vulnerabilities.

93.6% of federal IT projects costing more than $10 million have experienced cost overruns, schedule delays, or both. Since 2010, GAO has made over 1,800 IT management recommendations. 463 remain unimplemented. IT management has been on the GAO High-Risk List since 2015.

77,000 empty federal buildings. Across 24 surveyed agencies, federal buildings average an 80% vacancy rate. The federal government owns or leases 77,000 buildings that are empty or underutilized. The deferred maintenance backlog has doubled from $171 billion in FY2017 to $370 billion in FY2024. Annual operating costs: approximately $7 billion.

Federal real property management has been on the GAO High-Risk List since 2003. GSA identified 45 properties for disposal saving $106 million annually in operations and $3 billion in deferred maintenance. That's 45 out of 77,000.

Year-end spending sprees. Federal agencies operate under "use it or lose it" budgeting: unspent funds at the end of the fiscal year get returned, creating a predictable spending surge every September. Government-wide, agencies spend approximately 16.5% of annual budgets in the final month (vs. the expected 8.3%), with 8.7% in the final week alone.

Quality suffers: contracts initiated during the last week of the fiscal year are at least 2.3x more likely to receive lower quality scores. The GAO first flagged this pattern in 1978. Nearly half a century later, nothing has changed.

Duplicative programs. Every year since 2011, the GAO publishes a report on duplication, overlap, and fragmentation across federal programs. The 2025 report identified $100 billion or more in potential savings from unimplemented recommendations.

Of 26 federal homelessness programs across multiple agencies, only 2 had conducted a program evaluation in the prior 5 years. The government also operates 163 STEM education programs across 13 agencies ($3 billion/year) and 47 employment and training programs across 9 agencies, with the GAO finding substantial overlap in populations served and services offered.

Since 2011, implemented GAO recommendations have saved $725 billion in cumulative financial benefits. Hundreds of recommendations remain open.

---

Who needs these programs, and why

The budget math is clear: waste dwarfs the safety net. But there's a second problem with the "cut benefits" argument. It assumes these programs are charity. The evidence shows they're not.

Some people think that safety net recipients just need to work harder. 55% of SNAP households with children already work. Their jobs don't pay enough to cover food. As for the claim that benefits discourage work: SNAP already requires able-bodied adults without dependents to work or participate in job training to maintain eligibility.

Federal policy created these conditions, and they have compounded across generations.

The wealth gap is a policy outcome

The Federal Reserve's 2022 Survey of Consumer Finances (the most recent available) found median household wealth of $284,310 for white families and $44,100 for Black families. For every $100 in wealth a white family holds, a Black family holds $15.

Federal housing policies enacted between the New Deal and the Fair Housing Act built this gap. From 1934 to 1968, the FHA required racial segregation in federally insured housing. The Home Owners' Loan Corporation graded neighborhoods by race, marking Black neighborhoods as "hazardous" in red, the origin of the term "redlining." Of the $120 billion in federal housing subsidies between 1934 and 1962, only 2% reached nonwhite families. After WWII, only 0.7% of Black veterans obtained home loans under the GI Bill, compared to millions of white veterans. Banks refused mortgages in Black neighborhoods. Suburban developments like Levittown were restricted to white buyers by deed covenant.

These exclusions didn't end with the Fair Housing Act. Predatory lending in the 1990s and 2000s disproportionately targeted Black and Hispanic neighborhoods, and disparities in post-2008 foreclosure recovery widened the gap further.

Homeownership rates today: 75.1% for white families, 44.2% for Black families. That 31-point gap stems directly from decades of federal subsidies for white homeownership and systematic exclusion of everyone else.

Poverty rates reflect compounding disadvantage

The Census Bureau reports poverty rates of 18.4% for Black Americans and 7.7% for white Americans. Wage gaps relative to white men tell the same story: Black men earn 84.6 cents per dollar; Hispanic men earn 75.8 cents. The gap compounds for women: Black women earn 74 cents, Hispanic women earn 64 cents.

These gaps persist across every metric the "bootstrap" narrative cites. Bertrand and Mullainathan (2004) found that a white-sounding name on a resume generated 50% more callbacks, equivalent to roughly 8 additional years of experience. Kline, Rose, and Walters (2022) confirmed the pattern persists: across 83,000 applications to Fortune 500 firms, identical resumes with Black-sounding names received 2.1% fewer callbacks.

Mobility is not equal

Even Black boys raised in the top 1% of household income earn less in adulthood than white boys raised at the median. Economist Raj Chetty's research on intergenerational mobility found that Black children's income falls approximately 13 percentiles below white children at every parental income level.

This gap appears in 99% of Census tracts, even after controlling for parental education, marital status, and wealth. The structural barriers persist today, not as relics of the past.

So who uses safety net programs?

Black Americans, roughly 13% of the U.S. population, account for 25.7% of SNAP recipients, 45% of Housing Choice Voucher holders, approximately 30% of TANF recipients, and 29% of Head Start enrollees. 72% of Black college students receive Pell Grants, compared to 34% of white students.

Federal policy locked these communities out of mortgages, hiring, education, and wealth building for decades. These programs exist to begin addressing the damage. The cost of that entire effort, all eight programs serving tens of millions of people, is 3.3% of the federal budget.

---

Safety net spending generates economic returns

Low-income recipients spend benefits immediately at local stores, and that money flows to distributors, farmers, and their employees. The USDA's Economic Research Service found that every $1 in SNAP benefits generates approximately $1.54 in GDP during economic downturns.

The CBO has published fiscal multiplier analyses showing where different types of spending land:

Policy Type	Fiscal Multiplier	Source
Government purchases (goods & services)	0.5 - 2.5x	CBO
Transfers to individuals (SNAP, etc.)	0.4 - 2.1x	CBO
Tax cuts (lower/middle income)	0.3 - 1.5x	CBO
Tax cuts (higher income)	0.1 - 0.6x	CBO
Corporate tax provisions	0.0 - 0.4x	CBO

These multipliers measure GDP impact, not direct federal revenue returned. But the pattern is clear: providing financial assistance to people who will immediately spend it generates more economic activity than tax cuts for those likely to save. A dollar of SNAP benefits does more for GDP than a dollar of corporate tax relief.

---

The math doesn't add up

Eliminating every safety net program would mean 42 million people losing food assistance, 2.3 million families losing housing vouchers, 30 million children losing school lunch, and 6.3 million students losing Pell Grants. The savings: 3.3% of the federal budget.

The net tax gap alone is nearly 3x that. The government's own fraud estimate equals the entire safety net. The Pentagon cannot account for 63% of its assets.

Some argue that waste is harder to eliminate than cutting benefits. That's partly true: tax enforcement requires IRS funding (which has historically been defunded), IT modernization requires upfront capital, and reducing contractor fraud requires litigation. It seems more logical to focus on recouping some of the massive fraud, waste, and overspending rampant throughout the federal budget than to try to save a few percent of the total budget by defunding programs that help Americans in need.

"Pull yourself up by your bootstraps" requires boots. When the federal government systematically excluded communities from mortgages, education, and wealth building for decades, these programs became the response. Cutting them doesn't fix the budget. It abandons the people our policies already failed.

Sources

1. Congressional Budget Office. "The Budget and Economic Outlook: 2025 to 2035."
2. Government Accountability Office. "High-Risk List."
3. Internal Revenue Service. "IRS Releases 2022 Tax Gap Projections."
4. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. "Fiscal Year 2024 Improper Payments Fact Sheet."
5. USDA Economic Research Service. "Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)."
6. USDA Food and Nutrition Service. "SNAP Characteristics Report, FY2023."
7. Department of Housing and Urban Development. "Housing Choice Voucher Program (Section 8)."
8. Congressional Research Service. "Federal Pell Grant Program: Overview" (R45418).
9. USDA Economic Research Service. "National School Lunch Program."
10. Administration for Children and Families. "Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)."
11. Head Start. "Program Facts, Fiscal Year 2024."
12. USDA Economic Research Service. "WIC Program."
13. Administration for Children and Families. "Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)."
14. Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. "TANF at 25: Overly Restrictive Funding Structure and State Flexibility."
15. Congressional Research Service. "The Tax Gap" (R47858).
16. Government Accountability Office. "Tax Gap: Underreported Income" (GAO-24-106449).
17. Government Accountability Office. "Tax Compliance: High-Risk Area" (GAO-25-107743).
18. Government Accountability Office. "Government-Wide Fraud Estimate" (GAO-24-105833).
19. Government Accountability Office. "Improper Payments, FY2024" (GAO-25-107753).
20. Congressional Research Service. "Earned Income Tax Credit" (R48296).
21. Government Accountability Office. "Medicare Improper Payments" (GAO-24-107487).
22. Congressional Research Service. "FY2024 National Defense Authorization Act" (R47582).
23. Congressional Research Service. "Veterans Affairs Appropriations" (R48056).
24. Government Accountability Office. "DOD Financial Management" (GAO-25-108191).
25. EconoFact. "Has the Pentagon Failed Its 7th Audit in a Row?"
26. Government Accountability Office. "F-35 Will Now Exceed $2 Trillion."
27. Congressional Research Service. "Defense Acquisitions: DOD Contract Spending" (IF10600).
28. Department of Justice. "Boeing Settlement."
29. Department of Justice. "KBR/Halliburton Settlement."
30. Department of Justice. "False Claims Act Statistics, FY2023."
31. Government Accountability Office. "Federal IT Spending" (GAO-25-107795).
32. Government Accountability Office. "Legacy IT Systems" (GAO-23-106821).
33. Government Accountability Office. "IT Project Outcomes" (GAO-25-107852).
34. Government Accountability Office. "Federal Real Property" (GAO-25-108400).
35. Government Accountability Office. "Federal Buildings: High-Risk Area" (GAO-25-108159).
36. National Taxpayers Union Foundation. "Use It or Lose It Spending Analysis."
37. Mercatus Center, George Mason University. "Curbing Wasteful Year-End Federal Government Spending."
38. Government Accountability Office. "Duplication, Overlap, and Fragmentation" (GAO-25-107604).
39. Government Accountability Office. "Duplication Cost Savings."
40. Government Accountability Office. "Federal Homelessness Programs" (GAO-12-491).
41. Government Accountability Office. "STEM Education Programs" (GAO-18-290).
42. Government Accountability Office. "Employment and Training Programs" (GAO-11-92).
43. Federal Reserve Board. "Greater Wealth, Greater Uncertainty: Changes in Racial Inequality in the Survey of Consumer Finances."
44. National Community Reinvestment Coalition. "Decades of Disinvestment."
45. Massachusetts Budget and Policy Center. "A History of Racist Federal Housing Policies."
46. Consumer Federation of America. "Housing and the African American VA Home Loan Benefits Report."
47. Brandeis University, Heller School. "GI Bill and Racial Wealth Gap Report."
48. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (FRED). "Homeownership Rate by Race."
49. U.S. Census Bureau. "Income and Poverty in the United States: 2024" (P60-287).
50. Bureau of Labor Statistics. "Usual Weekly Earnings by Race and Sex."
51. Bertrand, Marianne, and Sendhil Mullainathan. "Are Emily and Greg More Employable Than Lakisha and Jamal?" American Economic Review 94, no. 4 (2004).
52. Kline, Patrick, Evan K. Rose, and Christopher R. Walters. "Systemic Discrimination Among Large U.S. Employers." Quarterly Journal of Economics 137, no. 4 (2022).
53. Opportunity Insights. "Race and Economic Opportunity in the United States."
54. Department of Housing and Urban Development. "Housing Choice Voucher Dashboard."
55. Administration for Children and Families. "TANF Recipient Characteristics, FY2020."
56. National Center for Education Statistics. "Race and Ethnicity Indicators: Financial Aid."
57. USDA Economic Research Service. "Quantifying the Impact of SNAP Benefits on the U.S. Economy and Jobs."
58. Congressional Budget Office. "The Macroeconomic Effects of Federal Fiscal Policy: A Review."